A
suffragette called Marian Wallace Dunlop (1864-1942) was the first woman to go on hunger strike while
in jail in July 1909. She was force-fed, a horrible, painful process involving
gags and nasogastric tubes. Soon, other suffragettes were also
subjected to this humiliating process. The Bishop of London visited
the women in prison and claimed there was no cause for concern and
that the whole thing was done in a spirit of kindness!
The
suffragettes had been frustrated by lack of progress, which they
addressed by employing more militant tactics. Continuous
disappointment only fuelled the anger of the Women’s Social and
Political Union who embarked on even more explosive action, causing
some ministers to harden their attitude to the indiscriminate
violence. For example, the most militant women resorted to damaging
National Gallery paintings and setting buildings alight as well as
biting and scratching policemen whose job it was to apprehend them.
It
was in this bitter maelstrom that the women began to retaliate by
refusing to eat and hostility towards them increased. They were
frequently represented as ugly, wizened, unpleasant old spinsters. In
1912, Sir Almroth E. Wright, the bacteriologist, wrote to The Times
saying the women’s frustration was due to the excess of the female
population over the male – it’s said there were over a million
more women than men. They should go abroad to seek mates,” said Sir
Almroth E. Wright. They should be kept away from politics, he
claimed, because of their physical and intellectual deficiencies as
well as their lack of moral standards.
According
to Great Events of the 20th Century,
Mrs. Winston Churchill retaliated with an ironic reply, reflecting
back to the hostile gentleman his own ridiculous accusations: “After
reading Sir Almroth Wright’s able and weighty exposition of women
as he knows them, the question seems no longer to be, “Should women
have votes?” but “Ought women not to be abolished altogether?”
The
“Cat and Mouse Act” Becomes Law
In
1913, the Prisoners’ Temporary Discharge for Health Bill was
passed, and became known at the “Cat and Mouse Act.” The
forced-feeding stopped, but the act allowed the authorities to
release a woman when she became weak and ill, so she could recover
and then be re-arrested when she was well. In this way, the
Government, under Asquith, could not be blamed if she starved to
death because it would be her fault – on the other hand, if she did
wrong, then she would be hauled back to prison. In this way, the
possibility of martyrdom would be avoided.
The
act became known as the “Cat and Mouse Act” because it symbolised
the way a cat plays with a mouse, torturing it for a time without
actually finishing it off. Worryingly, class also came into the
equation according to a suffragette, Jane Wharton, who wrote a book
claiming that working class women were more likely to be force-fed
than upper class women. Women were, in those days, defined very much
in terms of their gender and their class.
In
the end, the act actually undermined the Government’s position. The
suffragettes who were released to get well, did their best with the
help of friends and sympathisers to elude capture by the authorities.
The Government lost face and it was seen as a violation of human
rights, as indicated by the naming of the Act as The Cat and Mouse
Act. Prime Minister Asquith was regarded as the enemy.
The
philosopher and philanthropist, Bertrand Russell, left the Liberal
party and wrote pamphlets against the Government and in support of
the suffragettes. Someone wrote this extremely patronising short verse about him:
Although
we may oppose the plan
Of
giving womenfolk a vote,
Still
to the ordinary man
Few
things are more engaging than
The
Russell of the Petticoat.
Sensibly,
the poet preferred to remain anonymous, and finally suffragette
activities ceased with the onset of War in August 1914.
Great
Events of the 20th Century, Multiple
Contributors, The Automobile Association, 1989.
LGBT
Brighton & Hove, Janet Cameron, Amberley Publishing, 2009.
Thank you for posting, Janet. Stories like this need to be brought to light...
ReplyDeleteIt's easy to forget - and to remind young people what we owe. Thanks for your comment, John.
ReplyDelete