GRIM HISTORIES
Predators or Victims? Since history is written by the victors, how can we be sure who is the "bad guy"? A look at Britain's grim history through the ages.
Saturday 26 June 2021
A Spare Pair of Stockings - Just in Case
The olden days of Remington typewriters, dual erasers, dark grey for ink, white for pencil, and the hard, orange typewriter erasers - how did we manage? Those orange erasers often made a hole in the paper, which meant a total retype, and this was devastating if it was a long and complicated letter.
And a bit later smart Adler typewriters and tippex, small rectangles of white paper, You slipped a piece behind the ribbon so the treated part covered the mistake, then you would retype the key to fix the letter that needed correction, and this would be obliterated by the magic white stuff.
Sometimes it was hard to type because the office budget required as little heating as possible. Then, more mistakes were made by fingers numb and frozen - all the same, mistakes were not tolerated. The letters had to be placed inside a blotter "For Signature" book, so the boss could sign with his fountain pen without danger of a smudge.
In those days, girls from the typing pool were fair game and groped by the men in charge, but secretaries were often luckier, protected by their higher status. But not if they had a predatory boss. It was no good complaining because it would always be your fault. "Can't you deal with that yourself?"
Every new typist learned the pangram, "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog" because it used every letter on the keyboard just once.
Then there was Pitman's shorthand. Pages and pages of it. If your boss was a fast dictator, and you were a new secretary, sometimes it was hard to read back your work. If you were a temporary typist visiting a company whose business you were not familiar with, you hoped for a patient, understanding employer.
Every letter required copies, sometimes five or six for various departments, and you had to check regularly that the last carbon was producing a clear copy.
But the City of London was exhilarating back in the 1960s - marching across London Bridge on a brisk winter morning, a wave of bobbing bowler hats of the men and the high bouffant hairdos of the young secretaries. Big umbrellas used as walking sticks just for show.
Sharp suits and shiny shoes, and every good secretary carried a spare pair of stockings in her bag just in case she got a ladder. (Horrors!)
Wednesday 29 May 2019
PHILOSOPHERS OF ANCIENT TIMES - GET YOUR COPY!
PHILOSOPHERS OF ANCIENT TIMES
Now almost all the hypotheses that have dominated modern philosophy were first thought of by the Greeks; their imaginative inventiveness in abstract matters can hardly be too highly praised,” said Bertrand Russell. Russell acknowledged that some of these theories, in their early days, were “somewhat infantile” – nevertheless philosophers have developed and refined them.
These theories gained influence over the last two thousand years, and we still feel their influence today. You will be stunned at how their work has filtered through to modern times. You will recognise modern thinking in their thought and ideas that sometimes seem crazy, and at other times, incredibly perceptive and far ahead of their time.
Most of these early philosophers are men but that's not because women were inactive - as we know stories about the work and lives of the few fortunate enough to access education were not always preserved for posterity. I have, however, included an amazing woman, Aspasia, who was a rhetorician, a philosopher, a politician and a teacher, and who spent time debating with than Socrates and Plato. You can find more great women in my other book, Eighteen Amazing Women Philosophers. But those ancient male thinkers were pretty smart too!
Thursday 16 May 2019
Ghost of the Old Grey Nun in the Sergeants' Mess
Ghost of the Old Grey Nun in the Sergeants' Mess
Copyright Janet Cameron |
A phantom nun from an ancient burial place terrifies the tough soldiers in the Drill Hall next door.
An article in the Brighton & Hove Gazette dated 21 May, 1949 tells the story of a strange paranormal vision emanating from the churchyard of St. Nicholas Church. The writer's name did not appear on the article; possibly they preferred to remain anonymous.
The incident happened in the Sergeants' Mess at Queen's Hall Square at the Drill Hall, and the article was aptly entitled: "Ghosts in a Mess."
While in the mess, the writer heard someone chanting: "Don't hang about or the old grey nun will get you." He asked the RSM (Regimental Sergeant Major) who the old grey nun was, and his colleague took him to talk to sixty-three-year-old Sergeant Welfare in the billiards room. Welfare threw open the windows, revealing below the graveyard of St. Nicholas church next door. This place of burial dates from Saxon times, and all the gravestones, where monks and nuns had been buried centuries before, looked eerie in the moonlight.
Sinister Experiences
"There was a saying in the mess, before my time, about the old grey nun," Welfare said. "There have been stories. One night I was working too late to go home, so I slept in the billiards room. Something woke me up in a fright. It felt like a cold, clammy hand touching my face. There was something uncanny about it."
Gravely, the sergeant continued with his story, explaining how, about two years ago, he was back from Germany, having spent a month in hospital recovering from his wounds. While in the Drill Hall workshop, late at night, he had a sudden peculiar feeling. The atmosphere became cold and clammy and something - he wasn't sure what - made him feel uneasy. Then, every door in the long passageway opened and closed as though some phantom presence was passing through. But - there was no human being present.
Sergeant Welfare decided to get out of the building immediately. But this was not the end of his ordeal, because in the passageway he fell over a life and force pump. This had clearly been moved by some unforeseen force, as he remembered it being stacked close to the wall when he walked down the passage to the workshop. No human agency had moved it - so what had? Sergeant Welfare was confused and scared.
"I am not superstitious," he said, "but I have not worked in that place since."
Sources:
· "Ghosts in a Mess", Staff Writer, Brighton & Hove Gazette, 21 May 1949.
· Adapted from: Cameron, Janet, Paranormal Brighton and Hove, Amberley Publishing, 2019.
Tuesday 30 April 2019
Mary Lamb: Insanity and Matricide Among the Romantics
By Janet Cameron
It’s hard to imagine that someone guilty of killing her own mother went on to become a famous literary figure. Image by
Janet Cameron all rights reserved.
The life of
Mary Lamb (1764- 1847) was an extraordinary one. This gifted writer and loyal
supporter of her younger brother, poet, essayist and drama critic, Charles Lamb
(1775-1834), was always subject to bouts of insanity, usually accompanied by a
tendency to violence. This madness led to tragic results when she took a
carving knife to her own mother.
At the time
of this terrible incident in September, 1796, Charles Lamb worked at the East
India House in London. It seems he returned to their home just in time to wrest
the knife from her hand before she did further damage, but not in time to save
their infirm mother.
Mary Goes Into the Madhouse
Charles and
Mary Lamb’s father, John, worked for Samuel Salt, a Bencher at the
Inner Temple, and Salt was instrumental in assisting Charles’ entry to Christ’s
Hospital, where Samuel Taylor Coleridge was also being educated. The two young
men formed a lifelong friendship. He and Mary also had contact with Wordsworth,
Southey and Hazlitt.
Shortly after
the tragedy of the carving knife, Lamb wrote to his friend, Samuel Taylor
Coleridge on 17 September, 1796. The letter, published in Romanticism,
edited by Duncan Wu, acknowledges that Coleridge might already know about the
terrible calamities that had befallen the Lamb family, possibly from the “public
papers.” Lamb says:
“I will only
give you the outlines. My poor dear dearest sister, in a fit of insanity, has
been the death of our own mother. I was at hand only time enough to snatch the
knife out of her grasp. She is at present in a madhouse from whence I fear she
must me moved to an (sic) hospital. God has preserved me my senses. I eat and
drink and sleep and have my judgement, I believe, very sound.”
Bottom of Form
Bottom of Form
Charles
explains that Mary wounded their father in the attack and he needed care, as
did his aunt, but that he, Charles, was feeling calm and composed. No doubt the
poet found some consolation through his deep, religious beliefs.
A Bad Start In Life
Mary Lamb was
born on 3 December 1764. Her father was servant to a barrister, and her mother,
Elizabeth, the daughter of a housekeeper, had always been in service. In Kathy
Watson’s book, The Devil Kissed Her, Mary is described as
resembling the actress Mrs Siddons, being fairly attractive and with the same
long nose and dark hair.
The main
trauma she appeared to have suffered as a child was the death of her baby
sister. She was around four years old at the time, old enough to have cuddled
and played with the little girl. The grief of her loss remained with her
throughout her life.
There were
further trials when her father John’s sister, Hetty, came to live with the
family according to Watson. Hetty and Elizabeth disliked each other intensely.
Elizabeth was a gentle woman, and always anxious to please. Hetty was the
opposite. She found Elizabeth’s attempts to get along with her tedious and
oppressive, and suspected her sister-in-law of being deceitful.
Watson quotes
Mary: “They [meaning Elizabeth and Hetty] made each
other miserable for a full twenty years of their lives.” This, of
course, must have resulted in a tense and unhappy household.
On the death
of Salt in 1792, the Lambs had to move from the Temple into lodgings in Little
Queen’s Street. The family was poor and had to struggle to survive. This
compelled Elizabeth to work as a seamstress as well as bear and look after
their children, although of the seven children she bore, only three survived.
Charles Lamb: A Loyal Brother
Mary endured
onerous responsibilities, as Elizabeth became infirm and needed constant care
and attention. Perhaps it was little wonder she was prone to awful bouts of
insanity.
The newspaper
report of her trial in The Times, on Saturday, September 24, 1796,
expanded on the gruesome details, reprinted on the website Biographies: Charles
Lamb:
“On Friday
afternoon the Coroner and Jury sat on the body of a Lady, in the neighbourhood
of Holborn, who died in consequence of a wound from her daughter the previous
day. It appeared by the evidence adduced, that while the family were preparing
for dinner, the young lady seized a case-knife laying on the table, and in a
menacing manner pursued a little girl, her apprentice, round the room. On the
calls of her infirm mother to forbear, she renounced her first object, and with
loud shrieks approached her parent.
“The child,
by her cries, quickly brought up the landlord of the house, but too late. The
dreadful scene presented to him the mother lifeless, pierced to the heart, on a
chair, her daughter yet wildly standing over her with the fatal knife and the
old man her father weeping by her side, himself bleeding at the forehead from the
effect of a severe blow he received from one of the forks she had been madly
hurling about the room.”
After
Mary murdered their mother, she was officially certified as insane,
and sent to an Islington mental asylum. Charles, meanwhile, moved into
lodgings with his sick father, as close as he could to the asylum.
Fortunately
for Mary, as seen from his letter to Coleridge, Charles was a concerned and
caring brother. It may have helped that he, too, had suffered a fit of
temporary insanity in 1795, causing his confinement in an asylum for
several weeks. On her release, he took her into his care and guardianship.
Their father died in 1799, and so Mary moved into Charles’ lodgings with him.
Charles
devoted himself to her welfare and the two became inseparable, although Mary
was to continue to suffer from regular bouts of illness.
Charles’ Poem: The Old Familiar Faces
This poem,
composed in 1798, was, perhaps, cathartic for Charles Lamb. This young man had
to carry the burden of such terrible memories, while supporting his sick
sister. It should be remembered that at the time of the murder, when Mary was
32 years old, her younger brother was only 21. Here are two stanzas, the first
and the fourth.
“Where are
they gone, the old familiar faces? / I had a mother but she died and left me, /
Died, prematurely in a day of horrors – / All, All are gone, the old familiar
faces.
“I loved a
love once, fairest among women; / Closed are her doors on me, I must not see
her – / All, all are gone, the old familiar faces.”
Literary Activities
It might be
expected, after such dreadful trauma, the pair would live quietly and not
attempt any further demanding projects. The opposite was the case. Charles
wrote a poetical drama, John Woodvil, and a prose piece, Rosamund
Gray. He attempted journalism around the turn of the century, and he wrote
articles, criticism, articles and short, witty features for the Morning
Post and for The Londoner.
Next, came a
project the siblings could complete together. William Godwin, (husband of Mary
Wollstonecroft and father of Mary Shelley) commissioned Charles Lamb to
produce simplified versions of Shakespeare’s plays, and so Charles took on the
tragedies and entrusted the comedies to Mary. He called the book, “Tales
from Shakespeare.” Published in 1807, Tales was
a great success.
For Very Young Children and Young Ladies
However, the
book wasn’t just for children. Here is an excerpt from the original preface,
reprinted in the Introduction to the author’s copy:
“It has been
wished to make these Tales easy reading for very young children. To the utmost
of their ability, the writers have constantly kept this to mind, but the
subjects of most of them made this a very difficult task. It was no easy matter
to give the histories of men and women in terms familiar to the apprehension of
a very young mind.
“For young
ladies, too, it has been the intention chiefly to write; because boys being
generally permitted the use of their fathers’ libraries at a much earlier age
than girls are, they frequently have the best scenes of Shakespeare by heart,
before their sisters are permitted to look into this manly book…”
The Lambs
continue by entreating boys to assist their sisters and to explain to them what
was hardest for them to understand.
Obviously,
this was a well-meaning and probably effective action, although it says a great
deal about the shortcomings of society at that time – a society that excluded
“young ladies” from pursuits that might be too hard for them!
However,
the Tales are easy to read, and Shakespeare’s
language can sound strange to the ears of those who are not familiar with him.
The Tales are probably helpful to young men too!
Mary went on
to write some successful stories for children, including Mrs.
Leicester’s School in 1809. As ever, the siblings enjoyed
collaborating and Charles contributed three stories of his own.
Emma Isola and the Lambs
A rather
heartwarming addition to this sad story is that of Emma Isola, an orphan, whom
Charles and Mary adopted. In 1827, the three of them moved to Enfield, and
later to Edmonton. Charles’ contemporaries admired him for his gentle
personality and his whimsical humour, which attracted many friends. When he
died in 1834, he had outlived his friend, Coleridge, by six months.
Mary Lamb was
fortunate is having such a man for her brother, a brother who supported her
through terrible times, and who remained close to her and included her in
everything he did. But for their close relationship, it is doubtful Mary’s
legacy would be available to us. The following, touching passage appears at the
end of Charles and Mary Lamb’s Authors’ Preface to the Tales:
“…it is the
writers’ wish that the true Plays of Shakespeare may prove to them {e,g,young
readers} in older years – enrichers of the fancy, strengtheners of
virtue, a withdrawing from all selfish and mercenary thoughts, a lesson of all
sweet and honourable thoughts and actions, to teach courtesy, benignity,
generosity, humanity, for, of examples, teaching these virtues, his pages
are full.”
When Mary
Lamb died in 1847, at age 82, she was buried next to her beloved brother in a
churchyard in Edmonton, Middlesex.
Resources
for this article
Watson, Kathy. The Devil Kissed Her. (2004). Tarcher.
Accessed on November 25, 2014
Wu, Duncan
(Editor), et al. Romanticism An Anthology. (1994). Blackwell.
Lessing, Doris
(Editor), et al. The Cambridge Guide to Literature in English. (1988). Cambridge
University Press.
Lamb, Charles,
et al. Tales from Shakespeare. (1953 (orig.
1809)). Collins.
Drabble, Margaret
(Editor). The Oxford Companion to English Literature. (1987). Guild
Pubishing London.
Tuesday 23 April 2019
Bull-Baiting and Ducking Stools (not to Mention Third Nipples !) ~ Horrible Medieval England
Fine craftsmen from medieval times to the Tudors and Stuarts have left their mark on Canterbury's architecture - but "makeovers" have always been popular. They were undertaken mostly for vanity and fashion and for making an impression on your neighbours. This makes dating buildings difficult, although there are clues to indicate which buildings are wearing a facade, and, for the experts, these are as easy to spot as a nylon hairpiece!
The emergence of the coaching trade during the late eighteenth century made it imperative to modernise the streets, so gradually existing thoroughfares were improved and new streets cut. As always, change demanded sacrifice, so all gates were demolished except for Westgate, the City Gaol.
Bull-Baiting in Canterbury's Buttermarket
Two hundred years ago, Canterbury's famous Buttermarket was called "The Bullstake." Here, in the special bullring, bulls were baited prior to slaughter. Bull-baiting was a popular medieval sport. It was believed that the distress of the animals tenderised their meat and, after the baiting, the animals were moved on to Butchery Lane for slaughter.
The idea of the Buttermarket was to provide an open-sided building in which local farmers could trade their wares. After the original building was taken down, it was replaced by a more substantial edifice. Later, this too was replaced by the war memorial, which now stands in a prominent position in the irregularly-shaped "square."
The 16th Century Weavers' Houses
St. Peter's Street crosses the River Stour at King's Bridge. To the left, along the riverbank, is a row of medieval houses known as the weavers' houses, which date from the 16th century. This was where Huguenot and Walloon weavers plied their trade having fled their own countries to escape persecution. The houses, which are now used as shops and restaurants, have been restored and have twentieth century beams on their outside facades.
A grisly relic of medieval times is the ducking stool which hangs over the river. It was used to see if a woman accused of witchcraft was guilty or not. If the accused survived, she was deemed a witch. If she drowned, she was innocent.
In this age, Canterbury's swans did not enjoy the protection they do today. They were fattened and killed for banquets, but as the river was often used as a public lavatory, some of the poor birds died from pollution. This was not a good time to be a swan or a woman with a third nipple!
Sir John Boy's House in Palace Street
Palace Street is one of the best-preserved streets in Canterbury and its name derives from the Archbishop's palace, which was replaced by Archbishop Lanfranc after a fire in 1067. The famous Sir John Boy's House, is named for its owner, an MP and recorder of Canterbury, and built around 1612. It leans over at an alarming angle to the northeast, the tilt apparently caused by a twisted chimney and fallen bricks. The house is now supported by a steel cage.
St. Augustine and Thomas Beckett
From swampy wasteland, Canterbury has been visited by St. Augustine in AD597, sacked by the Danes in 1011, swarmed over by pilgrims after the murder of Thomas Beckett in 1170, and survived through to the horrors of witch-trials. Canterbury has been through the mire - to become what it is today - one of the most fascinating cities in the world.
Copyright Janet Cameron
Adapted from "Canterbury Streets" by Janet Cameron, Tempus Publishing (with permission.)
Adapted from "Canterbury Streets" by Janet Cameron, Tempus Publishing (with permission.)
Thursday 13 April 2017
Victorian Inventions - a Triumph of the Imagination
Queen Victoria, Public Domain |
The typewriter
appeared in 1867, the first telephone that actually worked was produced by
Graham Bell in 1876, and, in 1879 London was the first city in Europe to have a
telephone exchange. The phonograph (a talking machine) appeared in 1879. (Apart
from its more obvious uses, it must have been a great wonder for Victorian
children from wealthier families, as it was used to produce talking books and
talking dolls).
By the end of the century, the automobile, the electric
tramcar, X-rays, the cinema and the wireless were also making great changes to
Victorian lives. Yet, in 1865, when the railways totalled around 100,000 miles
in length worldwide, with their Pullman carriages, and great steamships
carrying thousands of passengers sailed across the oceans, bicycles were still
very basic contraptions.
In the late 1840s, Stringfellow
built a model flying machine with a wingspan of 3 metres. Its light steam
engine enabled it to fly around 15 yards. But, after that, despite meticulous
research, determination and a great deal of financial outlay, little progress
was made in constructing an aeroplane capable of carrying a man.
The only inventor who made any real progress
was a Frenchman called Penaud who designed a monoplane with many modern
features including an automatic pilot, but sadly he committed suicide while
still very young and before his efforts reached fruition.
Dirigible airships
were invented in the 1870s, but as we now know, did not achieve lasting
success, as they were unreliable and dangerous.
Victorians began producing large
quantities of cast steel in the 1860s, resulting in the construction of great
bridges and structures, The Eiffel Tower, the Brooklyn and Forth Bridges were
all completed by the late 1880s.
Electricity too, was a new excitement at that
time, when Volta, in 1880 developed a source for electricity using acid and
metals. Following this came electric motors, dynamos, the electro-magnetic
telegraph and finally transformers, all of which came into general use by the
mid to late 1880s.
There
were also some rather curious inventions and these are just a few examples.
Around 1870, the Pedespeed was a kind of skating apparatus, which had stirrups
and foot pieces attached to wheels which operated on the outside of the leg and
measured about 14 inches in diameter. Ladies had to use shields to cover the
tops of the wheels to protect their dresses.
In 1883, a tricycle for two
persons appeared, with two enormous wheels at the sides and one smaller wheel
in front. Two people could ride in it side-by-side and one could imagine it
would be a charming spectacle to see two ladies riding in it wearing their
pretty dresses.
In 1869, people could cycle on the water in a strange boat-like
contraption with a bicycle constructed at the back. But the most curious of all
must be the Velocipide, a bicycle in a shallow tub attached to a shower
contraption. The cycle actually worked the shower pump so Victorians could get
themselves clean and have a morning workout at the same time.
The Victorian capacity for turning
imagination into invention was truly an extraordinary thing.
Brighton, Murders and Misedemeanours by Janet Cameron (Amberley Publishing)
Wednesday 12 April 2017
Religion in the Fifth Century - Plots and Power
An actress, possibly Mary Anderson, in the title role of the play Hypatia, circa 1900. Wikimedia |
The end
of the Western Empire and the death of St. Augustine in 430 preceded
destruction and disaster as well as set the scene for the development of
Europe. Central to church issues at this time was the complicated problem of
the Incarnation.
St. Cyril was patriarch of Alexandra from 412 till his death in 444 while Nestorius was patriarch of Constantinople. The two could not agree on whether Christ was one or two persons, ie. one human and one divine. Nestorius was convinced that Christ contained both divinity and humanity - and that he had, therefore, two natures. Cyril took the opposite view, that Christ was one and one only.
Mary - Not the Mother of God?
The clash between the two patriarchs was furious and passionate. It was claimed, as quoted in A History of Western Philosophy:
"A secret and incurable discord was cherished between those who were most apprehensive of confounding, and those who were most fearful of separating, the divinity and the humanity of Christ."
This brought about further difficulties. Nestorius could not see how Mary the Virgin could be called the "Mother of God" when she was only the mother of the human element of Christ. As far as Nestorius could see, the divine part of Christ could have no mother.The bishops east of Alexandria agreed with Nestorius while those from the west thought that Cyril was correct. Cyril was enraged that Nestorius continued to lead Constantinople astray with his notion about the relationship between Christ's humanity and his divinity.
The Bishops Hatch a Cunning Plot
The Council decided to meet to discuss the matter at Ephesus in 431. But the bishops from the west of Suez had a cunning plan. They arrived early, then they barred all the doors to prevent "latecomers" from entering. Having eliminated the opposition, they decided for St. Cyril, who was presiding over the proceedings, asserting that Christ had only one nature and was only one person.
Nestorius, whose sect had a large following in Syria and throughout the East, was condemned by the council as a heretic but he refused to recant. It is said his tongue was finally eaten by worms for its eloquent seduction of others.
His religion continued to flourish in China centuries later, and adherents were discovered by missionaries in India in the sixteenth century. Sometime around 450, Ephesus began to favour the Monophysite heresy, maintaining that Christ has only one nature. In A History of Western Philosopy, Bertrand Russell says:
"If St. Cyril had been alive, he would certainly have supported this view and have become heretical.
"Hypatia - Tragic Victim of St. Cyril
St. Cyril's claim to notoriety, apart from his clash with Nestorius, was the brutal murder of a young female Platonic philosopher, Hypatia, who was dragged from her chariot, to be butchered and lynched. She had been falsely accused of preventing a reconciliation between Cyril and his friend Orestes, by influencing Orestes against him. Cyril was also know for his pogroms against Alexandrian Jews.
St. Cyril was patriarch of Alexandra from 412 till his death in 444 while Nestorius was patriarch of Constantinople. The two could not agree on whether Christ was one or two persons, ie. one human and one divine. Nestorius was convinced that Christ contained both divinity and humanity - and that he had, therefore, two natures. Cyril took the opposite view, that Christ was one and one only.
Mary - Not the Mother of God?
The clash between the two patriarchs was furious and passionate. It was claimed, as quoted in A History of Western Philosophy:
"A secret and incurable discord was cherished between those who were most apprehensive of confounding, and those who were most fearful of separating, the divinity and the humanity of Christ."
This brought about further difficulties. Nestorius could not see how Mary the Virgin could be called the "Mother of God" when she was only the mother of the human element of Christ. As far as Nestorius could see, the divine part of Christ could have no mother.The bishops east of Alexandria agreed with Nestorius while those from the west thought that Cyril was correct. Cyril was enraged that Nestorius continued to lead Constantinople astray with his notion about the relationship between Christ's humanity and his divinity.
The Bishops Hatch a Cunning Plot
The Council decided to meet to discuss the matter at Ephesus in 431. But the bishops from the west of Suez had a cunning plan. They arrived early, then they barred all the doors to prevent "latecomers" from entering. Having eliminated the opposition, they decided for St. Cyril, who was presiding over the proceedings, asserting that Christ had only one nature and was only one person.
Nestorius, whose sect had a large following in Syria and throughout the East, was condemned by the council as a heretic but he refused to recant. It is said his tongue was finally eaten by worms for its eloquent seduction of others.
His religion continued to flourish in China centuries later, and adherents were discovered by missionaries in India in the sixteenth century. Sometime around 450, Ephesus began to favour the Monophysite heresy, maintaining that Christ has only one nature. In A History of Western Philosopy, Bertrand Russell says:
"If St. Cyril had been alive, he would certainly have supported this view and have become heretical.
"Hypatia - Tragic Victim of St. Cyril
St. Cyril's claim to notoriety, apart from his clash with Nestorius, was the brutal murder of a young female Platonic philosopher, Hypatia, who was dragged from her chariot, to be butchered and lynched. She had been falsely accused of preventing a reconciliation between Cyril and his friend Orestes, by influencing Orestes against him. Cyril was also know for his pogroms against Alexandrian Jews.
Sources:
·
History of Western Philosophy,
Bertrand Russell, Routledge Classics, London, 2004.
·
Feminine Singular, Roxane
Arnold & Olive Chandler, Femina Boks Ltd. London, 1974.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)